Reading in English does not develop in the same way that language does (Moats & Tolman, 2009). Instead, it is a highly complex learned human behavior that for many requires code-based, explicit instruction (Young, 2023).
It is not enough to bring strong language comprehension skills to a text and assume comprehension will naturally follow. Conversely, automatic and accurate decoding without sufficient language comprehension will not prove effective.
Reading is more than sounding out words.
—Wiley Blevins
Classroom
Applications
According to phonics expert Wiley Blevins, at least 50% of a phonics lesson should be spent in application. That’s where the learning sticks.
Not all decodables are created equal. Ensure your decodable texts are instructive, comprehensible, and engaging, offering teacher support and family involvement.
Teach rich, content-area vocabulary explicitly to students and offer multiple exposures to these words in texts students read, listen to, and respond to.
Reading is a process of connected skills: language comprehension skills, decoding skills, knowledge building, and metacognitive behaviors and mindsets, including motivation and engagement, comprehension monitoring, and the executive functions of self-control, organization, memory, and time management.
Classroom
Applications
Form a Science of Reading Book Club to learn and share knowledge. See our Resources and References to get started.
Common Misconceptions
Some have assumed that since the Reading Rope graphic begins with separate word recognition and language comprehension strands, reading instruction should isolate word recognition (decoding) and language comprehension lessons. However, that approach is not always appropriate. In fact, students’ study of the word recognition aspect of the rope can relate to the language comprehension portion and to building knowledge.
Reading comprehension is generally understood to be a prerequisite to fluency. In fact, fluency also supports comprehension.
Proficient reading requires that the ‘strands’ associated with language comprehension and word recognition work seamlessly together in the brain’s processing systems.
—Moats, 2020;
Dehaene, 2009, 2013
Current and confirmed research points to other considerations that play a significant role in reading acquisition and teaching— for example, knowledge building. When knowledge building is prioritized, often through the adoption of content-rich literacy curriculum, vocabulary increases and reading comprehension improves (Davidson & Liben, 2019).
Another example is the role of metacognitive behaviors and mindsets such as executive functioning, comprehension monitoring, mindfulness, and motivation. According to Dr. Peter Afflerbach (2023), metacognition is the “awareness of own’s own knowledge…and the ability to understand, control, and manipulate one’s cognitive processes” (p. 10). A lack of attention to this keeps students relying on the feedback of others, lessening reading independence.
Together these processes, and others, form intricately connected roots that grow into a solid foundation for reading proficiency.
Knowledge building involves an emphasis on supporting understanding of big ideas and important concepts through extended reading and other experiences.
—Cervetti & Hiebert,
2019
Instruction in foundational skills and knowledge building instruction do not have to happen in isolation. Find ways to integrate knowledge building into your foundational skills instruction!
Some curricula overemphasize phonics isolated skill work, while ignoring other key aspects of early reading needs (e.g., vocabulary and background knowledge building) that are essential to long-term reading progress. These skills plant the seeds for comprehension.
Ways to connect instruction across phonics and knowledge building:
Source: Benchmark Advance, My Reading and Writing student accountable texts, and BEC Decodables aligned to unit topics